The LTs we had last year were departmental though (except for his finals) so Idk if he's gonna switch it up a bit this year. But what we had was a mix of multiple choice and problem solving! Study the concepts lang and try to attend the problem-solving classes (u still have those right?) and you're good to go!more
neutral
Is it difficult especially the problem solving part? :D
neutral1 reaction
No naman! If i remember correctly, our PS part was more on Lewis structures. so if u understand the basics of that oks ka na
neutralMSYS 42
I took her for MSYS 42 as well. We had one meeting in January, three in Feb, two in March, then two more in April where we crammed two modules and two quizzes. I don't think I learned much from her either. Her lecture style is really just reading the slides, with some days dedicated for in-class activities.
We really didn't do much in her class throughout the sem. Since I had a different adviser for MSYS 40 and 41, I was able to sit in his classes when possible so I could still learn something😭.
I suggest you enlist with another BAD prof *especially* as early as MSYS 40. Having a good foundation for BAD is imo super important and I think the experience will be better with a different prof.
Teaching this term
CCHEM 81.51INDUSTRIAL CHEMICAL REACTIONS AND PROCESSES, LECTUREValera, Nestor S.3.1Schedule TBARoom TBA2025-0
I had an OPMAN class with her so I'm not sure how she is with MSYS 40 but from my experience, if you really want to learn something, then choose another prof. Most of the time, she just sits and reads the ppt and whenever we consult our paper with her, its like she's not even sure of what she's saying😭 our group is confused half of the time.
BUT if you just want someone chill then choose her. Quizzes are fairly easy as long as you study. Not much work load in our class. She's approachable and kind naman but yeah I hope she improves in teaching.more
mixedMSYS 40
had her for msys 40.
Run. Not a terror prof, just straight up a horrible one 💀 i would say around 90% of what i learned was from external resources and not her class
Teaching was straight up reading from a powerpoint with somewhat valuable interjections of her experience working with meralco.
Assessments were given back the end of the sem, so the entire time, I didnt know what the hell my standing was.
Consultations with her were horrible because she would only glance at our work and say "it's good"(non verbatim) but once the defense came, our work was actually not "good" because the panelists pointed out flaws that she never pointed out
Shes kind and approachable though
Tl;dr: kind and approachable, but a horrible teacher who gives assessments late, and has useless consultationsmore